乘飞机前的步骤英语作文
关于”乘飞机前步骤“英语作文范文4篇，作文题目：Steps before flying。以下是关于乘飞机前步骤雅思英语范文，每篇作文均为真题范文带翻译。
高分英语作文1：Steps before flying
On my first flight last summer, I flew to see my uncle. I had nr been on a plane before, so when I heard the news, I was so excited that I couldn't sleep. The crew took me fm my parents to my seat on the plane.
Fortunately, my seat was near the window before the plane took off. I imagined how good it would be in the sky, but soon I was tired Can't sleep, the plane just landed, this is not an unforgettable thing.
中文翻译：
去年夏天我第一次飞行，我乘飞机去看望我叔叔，我以前从来没有坐过飞机，所以当我听到这个时我兴奋得睡不着觉，机组人员把我从父母那里带到飞机上座位上，幸好飞机起飞前我座位就在窗户附近，我想象着多好啊它会在天空中，但不久我就累得睡不着觉了，飞机刚刚降落，这难道不是一件令人难忘事吗。
万能作文模板2：飞行前步骤
On my first flight last summer, I flew to see my uncle. I had nr been on a plane before, so when I heard the news, I was so excited that I couldn't sleep. The crew took me fm my parents to my seat on the plane.
Fortunately, my seat was near the window before the plane took off. I imagined how good it would be in the sky, but soon I was so tired that I could sleep I don't know. The plane just landed.
Isn't it interesting.
中文翻译：
去年夏天我第一次飞行，我乘飞机去看望我叔叔，我以前从来没有坐过飞机，所以当我听到这个时我兴奋得睡不着觉，机组人员把我从父母那里带到飞机上座位上，幸好飞机起飞前我座位就在窗户附近，我想象着多好啊它会在天上，但不久我就累得睡不着觉了，飞机刚刚降落，是不是很有趣。
满分英语范文3：乘飞机前步骤
Cars pduce less pollution than aies, and they consume less fossil fuel, so it is necessary to limit some flights. Do you agree or disagree with this view? The argument that flight should be restcted is obviously invalid. It is not credible to compare the pollutants pduced by aircraft with those pduced by cars, bee an aircraft is shared by many passengers, and the car is usually used by only one person, or preferably a few passengers.
Suppose a toust dves sral miles, bns liters of gasoline, and emits emissions Square meter of carbon dioxide, this passenger is fully responsible for such envinmental pblems. Howr, if the plane consumes 1 liter of gasoline and pduces 3 cubic meters of carbon dioxide, and if all passengers take the plane together, how much envinmental responsibility should be borne by another passenger who takes the same distance by air, then there will be less damage to the envinment ed by air travel It must be taken into account: air travel saves time. The key is that n if car travel consumes less ener and pduces less pollutants, there are many reasons for air travel.
For example, patients are airlifted fm the injed place to the hospital. Opponents may argue that this is not unnecessary flight. Howr, it is ambiguous to use such a term to define unnecessary flight And vague.
Is there a law or generally accepted standard that clearly descbes the charactesti of flight? Therefore, the arguments mentioned in this thesis are neither logical nor practical.
中文翻译：
汽车产生污染比飞机少汽车消耗矿物燃料也少，因此有必要限制一些航班。你同意或不同意这种观点认为应该限制飞行论点显然是无效，把飞机产生污染物与汽车产生污染物进行比较是不可信，因为一架飞机是由许多乘客共用，而汽车通常只供一人使用，或者最好是几个乘客，假设一个游客开车数英里，燃烧升汽油，排放立方米二氧化碳，这个乘客对这样环境问题负有全部责任，但是如果飞机消耗1升汽油和产生3立方米二氧化碳，如果所有乘客共同乘坐飞机，那么另一名乘飞机相同距离乘客应该在多大程度上承担环境责任，那么乘飞机旅行对环境造成损害就少了另一件事也必须考虑到：乘飞机旅行节省了时间关键是即使乘汽车旅行消耗能源更少，产生污染物也更少，乘飞机旅行有很多原因，例如，病人是从地方空运到医院，反对者可能会争辩说这不是不必要飞行，然而用这样一个术语来定义不必要飞行是模棱两可和含糊不清。有没有一个法律或普遍接受标准可以清楚地说明飞行特征因此，论题中所提到论据在逻辑上既不合理，也不具有实际意义。
标签：